Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Two university supervisors examined the Education Teacher Performance Assessment (edTPA) and how it shaped the pedagogic relationships and decision-making processes of both students and themselves during the edTPA submission process. We drew upon Biesta’s (2009) notion that neoliberal accountability trades democratic relationships for consumer relationships and Attick and Boyles’ (in press) argument that edTPA resituates student teaching as a marketplace activity. Applying self-study methodology (Samaras & Freese, 2009), we documented our experiences supervising preservice teachers as they underwent the edTPA submission process. We found the assessment asserted control over our relationships with our candidates. As supervisors we became part of the transaction towards certification. Our candidates viewed us as arbitrators who could help them to fit the mold of edTPA.