Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of instructional coaching and family coaching models in Head Start using a randomized trial. The study design allowed us to compare the individual effects of each coaching model as well as their combined effect on student outcomes. The combination of both models produced the largest impact, while the family coaching model was generally more effective than instructional coaching, particularly for non-cognitive outcomes. However, given the high cost of the family coaching model, we found that instructional coaching was the most cost-effective. Based on estimates of overall costs and short-term impacts of Head Start, implementing both coaching models together would increase overall cost-effectiveness of Head Start by 64 percent.
David S. Knight, University of Texas at El Paso
Susan Landry, The University of Texas
Tricia A. Zucker, McGovern Medical School at University of Texas Health Science Center Houston
Jeffrey M Williams, University of South Florida
Emily C. Merz, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Cathy L. Guttentag, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Heather B. Taylor, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston