Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Educational leaders seeking doctoral degrees are often divided into two camps,
practitioner and scholar. This paper examines how the false binary of scholar or practitioner contributes to the perception of a divide among students of educational leadership by defining roles and purposes of of educational reform. Blended designations such as Practitioner-Scholar Activist-Scholar, and Academic Practitioner have arisen in response, but each fail to account for one of the three critical roles of Social Justice Leadership. This paper examines how students of educational leadership pushback against the tracking of educational reformers into scholar or practitioner and offer solutions for integrating scholarship, practical application, and advocacy.
Andrew Minor Baker, Texas State University - San Marcos
Isaac A Torres, Texas State University
Richard Pelton, Texas State University
Jason Swisher, Texas State University - San Marcos
Barry J. Aidman, Texas State University
Sarah Nelson Baray, Texas State University