Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Proponents of dialogic teaching argue for changes to classroom interaction to promote student language use and higher-order thinking. An under-researched aspect of dialogic approaches is the way students initiate and manage disagreement during their talk. This paper examines interaction in whole-class talk during a literacy lesson in an elementary school classroom, focusing on the ways students disagreed with each other during discussion of a controversial topic. Conversation analysis delineates methods used to disagree with the perspectives of others and to diffuse disputes that sometimes arose out of disagreements. The study highlights interactional practices employed by students to disagree, including those commonly found in ordinary conversation, and playful use of more academic and institutional ways of engaging in disagreement.