Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Formal testing dominates Singapore’s secondary school curricula; the Ministry of Education seeks to redress this through promoting assessment for learning (AfL). Success however requires teachers’ belief that AfL practices are valuable and achievable. A survey of all teachers in 12 secondary schools (n=913) investigated attitudes to 35 assessment statements. Statements elicited three responses: value, frequency of practice, and proficiency. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis identified four crosscutting factors: Alignment, Sustaining Engagement, Involving Students, and Grading/Reporting. Further analysis yielded hierarchical response patterns; results indicate teachers valued AfL more than they perceived concomitant skills or opportunities for use; conversely, Grading/Reporting was frequently practiced but valued less. Results inform regional and global AfL priorities including research-informed practice, professional development and policy enactment.
Christopher Charles Deneen, Nanyang Technological University - National Institute of Education
Gavin W. Fulmer, National Institute of Education - Nanyang Technological University
Kelvin Tan, National Institute of Education - Nanyang Technological University
Wei Shin Leong, Nanyang Technological University - National Institute of Education
Hui Yong Tay, Nanyang Girls' High School
Gavin T. Brown, The University of Auckland