Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
While the scholarly field of educational administration is heterogeneous and contested, its dominant scholarly branch continues to be grounded in the language of scientism and big theory. This study draws from John Dewey’s and George Herbert’s pragmatism and from Helen Gunter theorizing of intellectual history to culturally and philosophically ground the dominant scholarly branch of educational administration by systematically and comprehensively analyzing its philosophical claims and the corresponding philosophical debate in the wider field. Findings from this study confirm the dominant field’s structural, teleological, anti-democratic, anti-normative, non-experimental, non-reconstructive, and ideological tendencies. This study also shows that the philosophy of the dominant field could time and again be linked to conservative cultural tendencies, and especially in times of cultural unrest.