Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Although digital literacy is necessary for informed citizenship, teachers have limited assessment options. This paper outlines efforts to develop and validate a range of tasks that assess students’ abilities to evaluate online arguments and evidence. Fifty-six tasks have been piloted with middle school, high school, and college students in 12 states. 7,804 student responses have been collected. As part of validation studies, students (n = 45) completed think-aloud interviews as they completed 15 of the tasks. Results from piloting demonstrated that students struggle to evaluate online information and arguments. Analyses of think-aloud protocol data showed strong alignment between the thinking processes elicited by the items and the constructs they were designed to measure.
Joel Breakstone, Stanford University
Sarah McGrew, Stanford University
Mark D. Smith, Stanford University
Teresa Elena Ortega, Stanford University
Sam Wineburg, Stanford University