Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Many have criticized recent federal education policy for measuring school performance based on proficiency levels because it incentivizes schools to focus on marginal students closest to passing at the expense of low- and high-performing students (i.e., educational triage). The empirical evidence for triage is relatively slim, in part due to limitations of administrative data. This study uses data from a district that used multiple student performance metrics to explicitly identify and encourage schools to target resources to students close to meeting proficiency. The identification strategy—multiple assignment variable regression discontinuity—estimates the causal effect of being identified as a marginal student.