Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Among numerous learning outcomes, college students are encouraged to identify, evaluate, and effectively and responsibly use and share information with the aim of improving knowledge (AAC&U, 2007). This improvement of knowledge is described by Chinn, Rinehart, and Buckland (2014) as epistemic aims, or the process of gaining more knowledge and understanding of that knowledge. Responding to Taylor’s (2016) call of the need for more critical and nuanced perspectives in cognitive development research, I explored nontheistic and nonreligious students’ epistemic beliefs and aims towards two controversial online sources. Findings suggested that participants’ epistemic beliefs differed significantly and that their rationalization of intended aims provided insight into their (non)epistemic values. I conclude with implications that challenge assumptions of cognitive complexity and decontextualized notions of epistemic cognition.