Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Mixed methods instrument development studies have not experienced the complexity of discussion and elaboration that other mixed methods studies have received (Onwuegbuzie, Bustamante & Nelson, 2010). This study reviews 102 articles describing the development of 76 instruments using a mixed methods approach. The results provide insight into the presence of quality indicators in mixed methods instrument designs (O’Cathain, 2010), detail the use of the PROMIS® approach (U. S. Federal Drug Administration, 2009) to developing instruments, expand the concept of timing (Creswell & Plano Clark, 2011) to include a third recursive option for timing decisions, and provide evidence for a typology of mixed methods instrument development studies.
Michelle Howell Smith, University of Nebraska - Lincoln
Ann Arthur, University of Nebraska
Leslie R. Hawley, University of Nebraska - Lincoln
Natalie Anne Koziol, University of Nebraska - Lincoln