Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Current reforms in science education require that teachers enact teaching practices that are very different from what most teachers are used to. In this study, we take an organizational perspective to explore two case study teachers’ sensemaking about their implementation of an innovative science curriculum. High-quality curricula have the potential to help teachers transform their teaching practices if we can better understand the sensemaking behind teachers’ decisions to use, not use, or modify curriculum materials. Using qualitative comparative case study design, we contrast patterns of sensemaking for two teachers whose decisions resulted in differing outcomes for their students. We discuss how local context and issues of alignment influence teachers’ implementation.
Elizabeth Xeng de los Santos, University of Nevada - Reno
Charles W. Anderson, Michigan State University