Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Self-beliefs such as teacher self-efficacy are present in all learning experiences, and play a lead role in guiding teacher behaviors (Fives & Buehl, 2008). Teacher self-efficacy has been researched extensively in the past decade; however, Henson (2002) observed that self-efficacy scales are often adopted despite glaring psychometric problems. One significant source of measurement bias is the commonly used traditionally single-response Likert response format. This study aims to provide solid evidence for an alternative comparative response format by comparing two versions of one teacher self-efficacy scale, each with a different response format. Thurstonian item response analysis will be used to demonstrate the benefits of the comparative format as it applies to the development of self-efficacy scales and self-report scales more generally.
David Dueber, University of Kentucky
Abigail M. A. Love, University of Kentucky
Michael Toland, University of Kentucky
Trisha Anne Turner, University of Kentucky