Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
The bulk of political science research in higher education focuses on higher education institutions as recipients, rather than antecedents, of political action. Universities, however, do act politically. One of their main avenues for political action is lobbying, yet few studies in the half-century have examined higher education lobbyists. This paper attempts to fill that gap in the literature by examining university expenditures on lobbying. Through reports from the US House of Representatives and Senate it uses a difference-in-differences method to determine that the 2011 Congressional earmark ban resulted in an increase in Association of American University member institution expenditures on in-house lobbying. Additional research is needed to confirm that finding.