- Browse
Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
- Information Menu
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
- Navigation and Settings Menu
Personal Schedule
Sign In
- Social Media Menu
Facebook
X (Twitter)
53.077 - Year 2 Results for the Multiple-Choice Online Causal Comprehension Assessment: Project MOCCA
Sun, April 30, 10:35am to 12:05pm, Grand Hyatt San Antonio, Floor: Fourth Floor, Texas Ballroom Salon BSession Type: Symposium
Abstract
This symposium reports results from the second year of a three-year measurement study designed to develop, refine and validate the Multiple-choice Online Causal Comprehension Assessment (MOCCA). Papers focus on the original and new refinements of MOCCA, including item development and revision processes; Year 2 results, including results based on classical test theory, item response theory, and item feature and difficulty correlations; and the future directions for MOCCA, including developments with other age groups and response time and accuracy analyses. Results are suggestive of the positive potential for MOCCA to serve as a diagnostic measure of reading comprehension that not only distinguishes good and poor comprehenders, but also distinguishes types of poor comprehenders grounded in comprehension theory and basic research.
Sub Unit
Chair
Papers
A Review of the Original and Revised Multiple-Choice Online Causal Comprehension Assessment (MOCCA) - Sarah Elizabeth Carlson, University of Oregon; Ben Seipel, University of Wisconsin - River Falls; Gina Biancarosa, University of Oregon; Mark L. Davison, University of Minnesota; HyeonJin Yoon, University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Multiple-Choice Online Causal Comprehension Assessment (MOCCA): Year 2 Classical Test Theory Results - Gina Biancarosa, University of Oregon; Mark L. Davison, University of Minnesota; Ben Seipel, University of Wisconsin - River Falls; Sarah Elizabeth Carlson, University of Oregon; HyeonJin Yoon, University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Continued Efforts in Selecting an Item Response Theory: Year 2 Multiple-Choice Online Causal Comprehension Assessment (MOCCA) Results - Mark L. Davison, University of Minnesota; Gina Biancarosa, University of Oregon; Sarah Elizabeth Carlson, University of Oregon; Ben Seipel, University of Wisconsin - River Falls; Bowen Liu, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities; HyeonJin Yoon, University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Text and Item Feature Analysis of Multiple-Choice Online Causal Comprehension Assessment (MOCCA): Year 2 MOCCA Results - HyeonJin Yoon, University of Nebraska-Lincoln; Gina Biancarosa; Sarah Elizabeth Carlson, University of Oregon; Ben Seipel, University of Wisconsin - River Falls; Mark L. Davison, University of Minnesota
The Future of Multiple-Choice Online Causal Comprehension Assessment (MOCCA) and Diagnostic Assessments: Adult Readers, Reading Times, and a Computer Adaptive Version - Ben Seipel, University of Wisconsin - River Falls; Sarah Elizabeth Carlson, University of Oregon; Mark L. Davison, University of Minnesota; Gina Biancarosa, University of Oregon; HyeonJin Yoon, University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Discussant Comments Regarding Year 2 Multiple-Choice Online Causal Comprehension Assessment (MOCCA) Activities - Kristen L. McMaster, University of Minnesota