Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
This paper examines the possibilities of an ‘agonistic’ engagement with controversial issues as an approach to the education of a critical global citizenship. The paper draws upon data collected in a workshop conducted in an English university involving primary, undergraduate and postgraduate students, researchers and practitioners. The workshop aimed to generate an agonistic space in which ideas on global citizenship were discussed without seeking consensus. Data was collected via observations and participants’ written accounts. Our results suggest the difficulties of ‘dealing’ with conflict particularly among older participants who appeared to be more likely to fuel consensual decisions. We discuss how ‘agonistic’ controversial issues might help to challenge assumptions on neutrality and might foster re-articulations of power relations.
Edda Sant, Manchester Metropolitan University
Jane McDonnell, Manchester Metropolitan University
David Menendez Alvarez-Hevia, Manchester Metropolitan University
Karen Pashby, Manchester Metropolitan University
Sam Sellar, University of South Australia
Chris Hanley, Manchester Metropolitan University