Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
This paper assesses what is gained and what is lost through panethnic versus ethnic specific data collection and analysis. We argue that panethnicity and ethnic heterogeneity are not static binary choices, but instead reflect different modalities by which the lives, experiences, and identities of Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders (AAPIs) can be discerned for policy and practice. Both can work in concert to provide a fuller portrait of the diversity and complexity that exists among AAPIs in ways that highlight their unique positioning within broader patterns of racial stratification in the US. We advance a theoretical framework that allows us to intervene in current policy debates and evaluate the utility and policy consequences of using panethnic and ethnic specific data.
Michael Omi, University of California - Berkeley
Mike Hoa Nguyen, University of California - Los Angeles
Jason Chan, University of California - Los Angeles