Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
This paper presents the results of a mixed methods study which examined the use of tools for the auto-coding of qualitative data. The study sought to better understand how researchers, who are increasingly using apps, use them effectively. MonkeyLearn services were integrated into Dedoose and used to critically explore the effectiveness of automated sentiment analysis, keyword, and entity extraction and subsequent auto-coding. This processing focused on 17,000 journal abstracts. Results framed the discussion which focused on what these technological features can offer the end user and where automated routines might be misused. Findings inform social science researchers regarding the challenges and pitfalls of these features and draw greater attention to the methodological implications and limitations of current technologies.
Eli Lieber, University of California - Los Angeles
Dan Kaczynski, University of Canberra
Michelle Salmona, University of Canberra