Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
This meta-analysis examined the effect of computer-assisted instruction (CAI) on mathematics performance in China. Using rigorous inclusion criteria, we identified 33 qualifying studies, covering 13,171 students in grades 1-12. They produced a moderate overall effect (ES=+0.35) in comparison to traditional instruction. Of the various types of CAI, Cooperative-CAI and Inquiry-CAI had the largest effects (ES= +0.53 and +0.47, respectively). This finding seemed to support the logic behind the recent curriculum reform in mainland China. That is, CAI produced better results when combined with new teaching models. Supplemental-CAI and Transmission-CAI, however, are more cost-effective. The impact of other substantive and methodological study features on the variation of effect sizes by moderator analysis and meta-regression analysis are also discussed.
Chen Xie, The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Alan Cheung, The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Wilfred W.F. Lau, The Chinese University of Hong Kong