Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
This study extends research on the refutation text effect by examining processes and outcomes of learning from refutation text and graphic about seasonal change. Eighty-five university students were randomly assigned to four conditions differing for type of text and graphic (standard vs. refutation) in a pretest, posttest, and delayed posttest design. Eye-tracking methodology was used to trace information processing. Findings revealed that refutation text with refutation graphic induced greater processing compared to standard text with standard graphic, as reflected in a longer fixation time on the illustration of the scientific explanation and more integrative transitions from verbal to graphical information and vice versa. Readers of refutation text with refutation graphic also outperformed readers in the control condition for conceptual learning.
Sonia Zaccoletti, University of Padova
Lucia Mason, University of Padova
Caterina Tornatora, University of Padua
Sara Scrimin, University of Padova
Robert William Danielson, University of Southern California
Gale M. Sinatra, University of Southern California