Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
This study extends research on multiple-text comprehension, as revealed in an argumentation essay, by examining process data while reading webpages on a debated issue. We focused on the contribution of two types of process data: emotional arousal and processing time. Forty-six seventh graders read four webpages varying for reliability and position while their heart rate and eye fixations were registered. Results showed that the higher the emotional reaction to the reading material, the longer its processing. A regression analysis revealed the control variables of prior knowledge, reading comprehension, and working memory as positive predictors of argumentation, and emotional arousal and eye-fixation as negative predictors. A three-term interaction between emotional arousal, eye fixations, and type of webpage also predicted argumentation.
Sonia Zaccoletti, University of Padova
Sara Scrimin, University of Padova
Caterina Tornatora, University of Padua
Lucia Mason, University of Padova