Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
A simulation study was conducted to compare the performance of mixed model and conventional multivariate methods to assess two-group mean differences with two outcomes under small sample and missingness conditions. When total sample size was 40 or larger, the likelihood ratio test provided accurate Type I error rates and the greatest power for the omnibus multivariate test. Under these same conditions, mixed model conventional t tests provided accurate Type I error rates and the greatest power for tests of specific outcomes. For extremely small samples, the adjusted likelihood ratio test (α=.025) and the mixed model t test using the Kenward-Roger correction had the best overall performance.
Keenan A. Pituch, The University of Texas - Austin
Megha Joshi, The University of Texas at Austin
Ryoungsun Park, Wayne State University
Wanchen Chang, NWEA