Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Though much comprehension scaffolding research exists, confusion about the construct remains. In this theoretical paper, we argue for the importance of contingency—that is, responsiveness to student thinking—in reading comprehension scaffolding. We first define two sometimes-nebulous constructs: scaffolding and comprehension. We then argue that the multidimensional nature of comprehension requires contingency because the assumptions of pre-planned scaffolding can obscure emergent student comprehension. Three implications for research follow. First, research designs must isolate interactional scaffolding. Second, collaboratively analyzing scaffolding video is an effective tool for teacher educators and researchers. Finally, researchers should integrate findings with existing frameworks to illuminate both the transferable and idiosyncratic dimensions of scaffolding. This could include studying students’ utterances as well as teachers’.