Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Douglas’s Cultural Theory was used to explain the interrelationship of religiosity and leadership decision-making in selected public school settings, four in Israel and four in the US. In each country, the schools were classified a priori in Douglas’s schema: Individualist, Bureaucratic, Corporate, and Collectivist. Specific themes emerged in the research process. Participants in both countries explained religiosity and decision-making in terms of personal religious values and group influence. Participants in bureaucratic settings explained religiosity in terms of rules and roles, and decision-making processes were defined by regulations and status. Corporate perspectives emphasized group-defined religiosity where institutional norms promote and preserve spiritual life as well as guide leadership decisions. Participants in collectivist settings explained religiosity and decision-making in communal, egalitarian terms.
Iris BenDavid-Hadar, Bar-Ilan University
Ed Harris, Oklahoma State University
Stephoni Lynn Case, Southern Nazarene University