Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
This study examines an understudied aspect of teacher judgement: the way teachers make sense of data. With the aim of enhancing the quality of educational decisions, teachers are increasingly expected to collect data to inform high-stake decisions. However, the same data may be interpreted in different ways by different teachers. In this study, we used theories on data use, judgmental heuristics and an argument-based approach to validation to critically examine teachers’ interpretative arguments about pupils’ competences. First results show that teachers use subjective criteria to make sense of data collected rationally to a great extent. For theory and practice it implies that enhancing data use will not necessary lead to an increased quality of teacher assessment.