Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Dual concerns about teacher retention and teacher performance have fueled interest in “pay-for-performance” approaches, which provide fiscal and non-fiscal incentives to teachers who perform well within local accountability systems. Our current study employed an organizational theory lens to examine the relationship between organizational incentive systems and individual motivations within one urban charter management organization’s pay-for-performance system. Interviews with teachers and school leaders revealed that participants were primarily motivated by purposive incentives, even as their organization sought to implement a utilitarian system. This mismatch between organizational incentives and individual motivations helps to explain the primarily neutral or negative teacher perceptions towards the pay-for-performance system and may shed light on previously inconclusive findings regarding the effectiveness of this approach in schools.
Shani Shalev Bretas, Teachers College, Columbia University
Douglas Ready, Teachers College, Columbia University
Katharine Conn, Teachers College, Columbia University
Elizabeth Park, Teachers College, Columbia University