Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Despite the increased popularity of mixed methods and grounded theory research, the integration of both methods within one study is still evolving. As such, there have been few attempts to determine how researchers are using mixed methods-grounded theory (MM-GT). Our goal was to systematically examine how education researchers are using MM-GT, as compared to researchers representing other fields. We identified 61 MM-GT articles and divided them into two groups: those from the field of education (n=27) and those from other fields (n=34). We found that the majority of published MM-GT studies provided little methodological detail regarding grounded theory, mixed methods, and their integration; and that there were some interesting differences in how researchers across the two samples are using MM-GT.
Jared Stevens, University of Nebraska - Lincoln
Michelle Howell, University of Nebraska - Medical Center
Timothy Guetterman, University of Michigan
Wayne Babchuk, University of Nebraska - Lincoln