Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
This study compares the reasoning of dyads and individuals who are given publicly-available educational materials about adaptive cruise control (ACC), which include an interactive simulation, and asked to solve problems using the simulation. ACC is an enhancement of conventional cruise control that automatically adjusts speed based on traffic ahead. In addition to comparing group performance on these problems, we compare the collaborative reasoning processes of dyads who performed well on the simulation-based problems with those who performed poorly. This paper presents the results of this analysis, including a code set for analyzing collaborative problem-solving skills. We suggest that persistent, collaborative relationship-building and hypothesis creation were integral to a well-developed understanding of ACC when learning using this computer-based simulation.
Ethan P. Valentine, Kirkwood Community College
Yile Zhou, The University of Iowa
Benjamin M Devane, The University of Iowa
Joyce L. Moore, University of Iowa