Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
The purpose of this study was to explore the different types of embodiment and their effects on children’s learning in science. Participants were elementary school students from urban public schools attending a robotics after-school program. Three types of embodiment were examined in this study: Direct Embodiment (DE), Surrogate Embodiment (SE), and Direct and Surrogate Embodiments combined (DSE). A control group was also added to this study where participants received no embodiment. Students in all three embodiment groups outperformed students in the control group while the Direct and Surrogate Embodiment (DSE) group performed the best. The findings suggest that increasing students’ embodied experience can enhance children’s understanding in science as compared to children with limited or without the embodied experience.
Carol M. Lu, Teachers College, Columbia University
Laura M. Lu, Teachers College, Columbia University
John B. Black, Teachers College, Columbia University