Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
The ever-increasing internationalization and marketization of higher education have catered the perfect context for global rankings to become the main device to inform decision and policy making in higher education, despite widespread criticisms about methodological flaws in their design. Considering their critical role in shaping policy and practice in higher education, our purpose was to examine the most renowned rankings –ARWU, THE, and QS – and assess the extent to which these are informative measures of institutional performance. Preliminary analyses show these rankings are measuring the same underlying construct, which based on appears to correspond to perceived prestige. Indicators about institutional characteristics are not reliable measures of this underlying construct.
Paulina Perez Mejias, Foreign Service Institute
Alberto F. Cabrera, University of Maryland
Roxana Chiappa, University of Washington - Seattle
Kristin LaRiviere, University of Maryland - College Park