Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Many students struggle with the core concept of mathematical equivalence. Our paper describes a study comparing two interventions designed to help second grade students develop a robust understanding of equivalence. Both conditions provided students with non-traditional arithmetic practice including various problem formats, different symbols to represent equivalence, and practice sets grouped by equivalent values or sums. The treatment intervention replaced portions of non-traditional arithmetic practice with additional activity types; i.e., lessons that first introduce the equal sign outside of arithmetic contexts, concreteness fading exercises, and prompts to compare and explain problem formats and solution strategies. Applying a variety of research-based design principles to arithmetic practice improves student understanding of mathematical equivalence enough to support transfer to novel problem types.
Jodi Davenport, WestEd
Kristen Johannes, WestEd
Yvonne Kao, WestEd
Caroline Byrd Hornburg, Purdue University
Nicole M. McNeil, University of Notre Dame