Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Members of a teacher educator collaborative consistently advance democratic values of voice, inclusion, and community in preparing teacher candidates to incorporate those same values in their work with young adolescents. Through self-study, conceptually grounded in collaboration (Samaras, 2011) and methodology of dialogue (Guilfoyle, et al., 2007), undertaken to identify our dispositions and work habits that may contribute to preparing high quality teachers, we learned that the social metacognition lens does illuminate our work habits. Here we contrast the psychological perspective of social metacognition to the research tools of collaboration and dialogue in response to LaBoskey’s call for additions to the knowledge base of self-study, by examining “the differences and relationship between the methods and methodology of self-study” (2007, p. 1169).
Karynne L M Kleine, Young Harris College
Joanne L. Previts, Georgia College
Kristina Nicole Falbe, Illinois State University
Nancy B. Mizelle, Georgia College & State University