Paper Summary
Share...

Direct link:

Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México–Facultad de Estudios Superiores Aragón Students' Critical Response to the Mexican Neoliberal Model After the 1999 Strike

Sun, April 15, 10:35am to 12:05pm, Millennium Broadway New York Times Square, Floor: Fourth Floor, Room 4.04-4.05

Abstract

Objectives or purposes
The purpose of this presentation is to put US-based education researchers in touch with research representatives of Discourse Theory and Political Analysis as developed at La Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México de la Facultad de Estudios Superiores (UNAM-FES) Aragón. Exemplifying a Latin Americanist approach to Discourse Theory and Political Analysis (Puiggros & Marengo, 2013), this presentation reflects on the theoretical and epistemological colonialism and resultant consequences of enterprise pedagogy in the academic curriculum.

Perspective(s) or theoretical framework
This presentation draws on critical theory and pedagogy in understanding the current neoliberal economic model that has brought the world devastating human consequences (Dussel, 2011; Giroux, 1993; Puiggros & Marengo, 2013). The public school, as an on-going site of dispute within the capitalist system in Mexico, has been increasingly adjusted to absurd notions of “training” through the values of competition within neoliberal markets. Within this dispute, instructors and students find themselves in the contradictory public educational space that moves between the desire of the state to privatize academics and political resistance from a large part of their community.

Methods, techniques, or modes of inquiry
Working through notions of reflective teacher research (Cole & Knowles, 2000) aligned with critical pedagogy (Freire, 1970), this research developed a purposive sample of two groups of students in their junior and senior years at the UNAM-FES. Following reflective teacher research informed by critical theory and pedagogy, students engaged in critical analysis and discussion.

Data sources, evidence, objects, or materials
Working with groups of junior and senior-level students, data sources included informal observations, work samples, student interviews, and conversations with students. These data sources were analyzed using on-going reflection and teacher experience inherent in reflective practice literatures (Cole & Knowles, 2000). Analysis focused on data patterns that emerged within the practices of teaching and learning.

Results or substantiated conclusions
The preliminary findings of this study reflected the contradictions of enacting critical theory and pedagogy.
1. Students learned to see and critique social structures, understood elements of critical pedagogy, and demonstrated these understandings in class discussions and course work.
2. Students’ nascent critical understandings of the potentials of critical theory and pedagogy were circumscribed by material realities and limits imposed by market-based common sense.

Scientific or scholarly significance of the study or work.
Overall, this study details attempts to engage students in critical theory and pedagogy in the classroom at UNAM-FES Aragón, and it adds to an international discussion on the importance in bringing democratic practices to teaching through the participation of the students. In sum, critical pedagogical reflection has to be learned by practice within global-local contexts.

References
Cole, A. & Knowles, G. (2000). Teaching is research. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Dussel, Enrique (2011) Introducción a una filosofía de la liberación latinoamericana. México, Cerezo.

Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogía del oprimido México, Siglo XXI Editores.

Giroux, H. A. (1993). La escuela y la lucha por la ciudadanía. México, Siglo XXI Editores.

Puiggros, A. & Marengo, R. (2013) Pedagogía: Reflexiones y Debates. Buenos Aires, Universidad Nacional de Quilmes.

Author