Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Registraion, Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
What can philosophers of education learn about “post-truth” from philosophy of science? To answer this question, I analyze one instance where a post-truth framework was applied as the “symmetry principle”—agnosticism to the truth or falsity of scientific claims—to the question of including Intelligent Design in a high school biology curriculum. A close reading of Kitzmiller. v. Dover Area School District court transcripts reveals that the testimony of philosopher of science, Steve Fuller, encourages historically broad views of science that are absent from many classrooms but implicates classroom science in reactionary politics. To operationalize strategies for combating post-truth, we must grapple with such normative applications by considering epistemological pluralism, while also answering to the political implications of science generally.