Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Registraion, Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
We examined whether the use of personal anecdotes could promote knowledge revision.
Participants read refutation-plus-explanation, refutation-only, and explanation-only texts that addressed misconceptions about vaccines and autism. Texts were either framed as personal anecdotes or traditional expository texts. The results showed that participants read target sentences of the correct idea faster when texts were framed as personal anecdotes, suggesting that texts with anecdotal features facilitated greater knowledge revision than texts framed as expository texts. Posttest findings showed that participants performed significantly less accurately when they read texts that refuted misconceptions but did not explain the correct idea (i.e. refutation-only texts).
Reese Butterfuss, Arizona State University
Jasmine Kim, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities
Katherine Hock
Susan R. Goldman, University of Illinois at Chicago
Panayiota Kendeou, University of Minnesota