Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Registraion, Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
This paper draws on four secondary-level classroom deliberations on Internet privacy conducted in 2016. The challenge of these deliberations contrasted with the success of a previous round of deliberations with the same students on immigration policy. For the majority of participating students (N=100), Internet privacy was a non-controversial issue. This case study complicates categorization of controversial public issues (CPI) as “settled,” “open,” or “tipping,” highlighting issues around the design of classroom deliberations and asking whether teachers should create controversy where none exists. The study also raises questions regarding students’ views of Internet privacy as personal (individual) rather than collective (societal) and what this suggests for advancing ideas about citizenship—as something that extends the self—in social studies education.
Margaret S. Crocco, Michigan State University
Avner Segall, Michigan State University
Anne-Lise F. Halvorsen, Michigan State University
Rebecca Jacobsen, Michigan State University
Alexandra M Stamm, Michigan State University