Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Registraion, Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
This study aims to examine how teachers decide to intervene students’ negotiation of uncertainty to produce a productive moment. Qualitative interpretative approach was employed on 2th, 5th, 7th and 10th-grade science classrooms transcription in order to analyze: (a) the situations teachers decide to intervene argumentation to manage uncertainty , (b) how a teacher use epistemic and social framings to scaffold students’ uncertainty, and (c) the social and epistemic consequences of a teacher’s scaffolding. The results showed four conditions that cause teachers scaffold students’ uncertainty: (1) use students’ diverse ideas to challenge the class, (2) scaffold student use of evidence, (3) repeat/summary the critical points students made, and (4) connect prior knowledge/science language to current topics.
Ratrapee Inging Techawitthayachinda, Arizona State University
Ying-Chih Chen, Arizona State University
Chin-Chung Tsai, National Taiwan Normal University