Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Registraion, Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
The controversy that surrounds the benefits of athletic participation for K-12 students requires ongoing conversation. An alarming amount of negative media attention has been given to certain school districts, coaching personnel, and organizations about their handling of student-athletes (cf., McCabe, 2015), who are often valued only for their athletic promise (Casey, 2015; Lapchick, 1987). It is reasonable that teachers, coaches, and administrators would be concerned about student-athletes entering classrooms disengaged, unmotivated and, most importantly, lacking academic and social self-esteem. Most student-athletes understand that passing through the doorway to practice entails a transition from one set of expectations to another. Finding ways to better integrate those expectations is a challenge, but crucial for student-athlete growth. In lower socioeconomic settings where there is a scarcity of resources, children are at higher risk of delinquent behavior without a positive outlet. Research shows that sports-based extracurricular activities stimulate success in the classroom and spur progress in social development (Marsh & Kleitman, 2002; Payne & Fogarty, 2007). Educational leaders now realize that, in order for student-athletes to reach their full potential, the entire district must function as one village. In particular, there is a need to eliminate the cultural assumption that athletics exist and function as a separate entity within the district.
In this paper, I draw upon Erikson’s (1968) identity theory and social identity theory (Hogg, 2001; Tajfel, 1974) to examine how the interworking of team membership, self-esteem, relationship-building, and social status are associated with the athletic subculture and might be tapped by K-12 educators to benefit student-athletes. I employ a case study approach (Sieminski, Messenger, & Murphy, 2016; de Vaus, 2001) to explore these themes within a novel initiative developed by high school educators at an urban high school in Michigan. The teachers had noticed how the student-athletes were isolated and had a sense of superiority and entitlement. Most troubling was how, once they were outside of athletics, they were non-contributors to the school. In response, several teachers developed an after-school enrichment program—a leadership club—that capitalized on the student-athletes’ desires to compete and be seen as leaders. The broad goal of the club was to create a more inclusive school culture. Moreover, the teachers and administration hoped the club would change the behaviors and mindset of the student-athletes. The program grew in popularity, with teachers and coaches seeing encouraging signs of such changes among the student-athletes. As I elaborate in the full paper, this case study provides a practical example of group membership, loyalty, and the isolation that exist once student-athletes become emerged in the athletic subculture, and how educators might build relationships between that subculture and its academic complement.