Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Registraion, Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Using media analysis, this paper focuses on coverage of controversies over state-mandated assessments, opting-out, and the “public good” within public education. Through opt-out movements, activists urge a reconsideration of testing. Critics of opting-out argue that it undermines the public good of collecting valid assessment data for all students, to address educational inequalities. The opt-out movement thus surfaces questions about individuals’ rights to refuse aspects of public education as well as their reasons for doing so. Given current skepticism about reason and evidence in our democratic political life, it’s important to understand the reasons policy actors give for their decisions on public matters. As such, we examine media coverage of the opt-out movement, focusing on stakeholders’ reason-giving around testing and opt-outs.
Michele S. Moses, University of Colorado - Boulder
Wagma S. Mommandi, University of Colorado - Boulder
Terri S. Wilson, University of Colorado Boulder