Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Registraion, Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
When learning from expository text, it is important that learners not only comprehend the information provided but also accurately monitor and judge their comprehension, known as metacomprehension accuracy. However, learners’ metacomprehension is often inaccurate. We investigated to what extent the achievement emotions that students (N = 50) experienced during reading and testing influenced their text comprehension and metacomprehension accuracy regarding predictions and postdictions. The results indicated that greater anger and hopelessness during reading led to poorer comprehension. Moreover, greater anxiety, shame, and hopelessness during reading resulted in more underconfident predictions. Finally, greater anger, shame, and hopelessness during testing led to more underconfident postdictions, whereas greater hope during testing led to more accurate postdictions. Theoretical and practical implications are provided.
Anja Prinz, University of Freiburg
Janina Riedel, University of Freiburg
Joerg Wittwer, University of Freiburg