Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Registraion, Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
As the STEM movement gathers public and scholarly attention it is important to scrutinize its curriculum goals. Technology and education has had an uncritically positive association, and the ethical dimension of design decision making has been conspicuously absent. The goals of this theoretical paper are to develop a curriculum justification for the privileging of one form of knowledge over another. This is done by considering the natures of Science, and Technology, as interested in the natural and the artificial worlds respectively. Such considerations buy us the conclusions that context dependency of truth claims may be used as a basis for its discrimination, and that appreciating sites of contentious knowledge opens up possibilities for achieving liberatory goals for education.