Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Registraion, Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Spoken word poetry performance has been my reckoning, my accountability, my reflection and my pedagogy for the last decade. I remember struggling to bridge what felt like an immeasurable distance between my artistic performance as a spoken word artist and my aspirations for my scholarly work as an educator simply because I had no language for the spiritual experience that performance always is for me. KRS-One (2002) taught us all that the fifth element of Hip-Hop, “knowledge of self” is central to the role we play as artists and cultural practitioners, because knowledge of self creates a chance to “know the universe and God”. I understand spoken word poetry as both an intense embodied performance and a spiritual process which overlaps with my hip-hop pedagogy and praxis as it is a “reflection of Hip-hop culture and [has] particular strengths in teaching” (Emdin, Adjapong, Levy, 2016, p. 319). My artistic body of work is translated through my physical embodiment, one that Hip-hop feminist Aisha Durham (2010) insists we must acknowledge in scholarly work, because the art it produces causes us “to react at a visceral level” (p. 129). This paper explores three aspects of my subjectivity that spoken word poetry performance continues to interface with and elevate: artist, educator, activist.
My exploration into these subjectivities is grounded on Watson’s (2017) framework for understanding spoken word poetry as a tool for deep learning, a tool she asserts as powerful enough to transform a traditional classroom setting into “sanctuary” where “something sacred” is taking place (p. 15). The fifth element, knowing who we are, is the spiritual component of Hip-hop that extends and deepens the roots of our Hip-hop Ed praxis and can be effectively cultivated through spoken word poetry. Emdin, Adjapong, and Levy’s (2016) ground-breaking critical inquiry argues for a pedagogy that invites students to vocalize and express their lived experiences and insists on attention to both the emotional and intellectual processes that take place. Indeed, they remind us “hip-hop provides such spaces because of the ways in which it captures the imaginations” and if Hip-hop praxis encourages the use of imagination for youth of color, then it also allows for learning to occur as a spiritual process (p. 309). This paper offers concrete examples of co-creating social justice spaces and practices toward dismantling what Kelly (2016) describes as a system of silence.