Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Registraion, Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
The generality requirement represents one of the most important, yet challenging aspects of proof for students to understand. This paper describes how one student, Lexi, developed understanding of the generality requirement while participating in an introduction-to-proof design study that aimed to facilitate understanding of the generality and purpose of proof. Through analyzing Lexi’s work on proof tasks and evaluations of provided responses across four interviews, I describe her transition from believing that examples constituted proof to believing that proofs should explain why and adhere to the generality requirement. The case of Lexi reveals the potential benefits of using the explanatory feature of proof to explain the purpose of proof as well as support the transition away from examples-based arguments.