Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Registraion, Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
In this paper, Drs. Ian Wilkinson and Alina Reznitskaya will report findings from a three-year research and professional development program designed to help elementary school teachers engage in dialogic teaching (Alexander, 2017) to support the development of students’ argument literacy. They define argument literacy as the ability to comprehend and formulate arguments through speaking, listening, reading, and writing (cf. Graff. 2003). Predicated on a view that argumentation skills and practices are best developed through participation in dialogue, the professional development program focused on promoting teachers’ use of ‘inquiry dialogue’ (Walton, 1998) to foster students’ argument literacy. Using a design-based methodology, they assessed the impact of the professional development on teachers’ enactment of inquiry dialogue in text-based discussions and, ultimately, on students’ argumentative reading and writing. Analyses of videotaped discussions showed that there were substantial improvements in teachers’ facilitation of inquiry dialogue and in the quality of students’ argumentation. Multilevel analysis on posttest measures showed effects on students’ argumentative reading and writing. The affordances, and constraints, of dialogic teaching for fostering argumentative reading and writing are discussed.