Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Registraion, Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
This paper examines how students come to develop models of nation-states that privilege hegemonic ideas around power and territorial expansion. Through employing what I call path-dependent reasoning–or “reasoning backward” from the eventual outcome of an event–students overwhelmingly created models of nation-states where territorial expansion was inevitable. However, I contrast the overwhelming cases with two instances where students employed a different reasoning framework–what I call “reasoning forward” as if they were reasoning from the period in question. I label this an imaginative act of historical thinking, and I speculate about the possibilities of countering hegemonic logics with this imaginative reasoning framework