Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Registraion, Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
The standardized mean difference is commonly used as the effect size quantifying treatment effects on continuous outcomes. Many meta-analysts use inverse-variance weighting to pool effect sizes that needs each cluster size information. While most primary studies reported total sample size, some primary studies did not report cluster sizes separately resulting those studies were excluded. Therefore, we conducted real data analysis and simulation study evaluating performance of alternative approach (equal cluster size assumption) under RVE and three-level model. Results indicate that use of list-wise deletion showed low power whereas use of equal sample size assumption with RVE provided accurate and unbiased results even when true cluster sizes were unbalanced. Results are discussed and guidelines for applied meta-analysts are provided.