Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Registraion, Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
In this paper we examine museum professionals’ perspectives on controversial science exhibitions. In so doing, we used qualitative data from interviews conducted with museum professionals engaged with controversial science exhibitions in Brazil, Canada, Italy, Finland, U.S. and Zimbabwe. The theoretical lenses of scientific literacy and science communication helped us make sense of our data. During the analyses process, we used constant comparative methods to identify emergent themes. Our findings suggest that museum teams’ perspectives speak about possibilities of challenging visitors’ beliefs, disrupting traditional science narratives and unraveling the communicative potential of dialogue and participation. These findings shed light on the ways in which the science museum landscape is changing and how controversy can help transform dominant practices in these institutions.
Ana Maria Navas Iannini, University of Toronto
Erminia G. Pedretti, OISE/University of Toronto
Daniel Atkinson, University of Toronto