Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Registraion, Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
This paper examines epistemic shifts over the course of one year of interviews with “Bailey,” specifically in relation to the interviewer’s tendency to praise Bailey. Initially, Bailey sought the researcher/interviewer’s advice, establishing herself as having a knowledge deficit (K-) and the interviewer/researcher as an expert (K+). The researcher noted epistemic shifts partially demonstrated through Bailey’s self-praise, which established Bailey as knowledgeable and an advisor to others (K+). The researcher noted that Bailey’s K+ self-descriptors contradicted conversation norms, in that individuals typically downgrade their accomplishments and abilities in talk with others. In reexamining the data, the researcher found that Bailey’s self-praise was in response to the interviewer’s talk, as the interviewer actively praised Bailey and Bailey’s teaching practice throughout the data.