Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Registraion, Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Concept mapping is an effective way of making group thinking visible during collaborative science activities. Scaffolding the construction of causal maps from an immersive virtual world enables students to represent the complex causal relationships in the simulation. This paper details our automatic coding of claims and evidence used by students in their concept maps, with a focus on how maps vary by the sources of evidence they depend on. We analyze structural differences between students’ concept maps, the different types of claims made, and the roles of different types of evidence present in the world. Future work will synthesize this automated coding with log file data to see longitudinally how groups’ thinking changes over time.
Joseph M. Reilly, Harvard University
Shari J. Metcalf, Harvard University
Jamie Studwell, Harvard University
Amy M. Kamarainen, Harvard Graduate School of Education
Tina A. Grotzer, Harvard University
Christopher J. Dede, Harvard University