Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Registraion, Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Freshmen (6) in a multi-cultural college communications course were chosen randomly to participate in a 3-month semester study. Students were asked to read a novel and pro and con articles on capital punishment. A pretest and posttest were given at semester’s beginning and end asking students’ opinions on this issue. Student opinions in small group discussion were recorded. Verbal and written dialogue was coded through analytic deduction. Student responses were tabulated and categorized independently by the researcher and her assistant. Students’ oral and written responses increased during the study. Through critical dialogue 3 out of 6 students moderated or changed their opinions. Controversial issues appeared to support an increase in student communication and stimulate ethical consideration and critical thinking.