Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Registraion, Housing and Travel
Personal Schedule
Sign In
To examine measurement invariance in a multigroup confirmatory factor analysis (MCFA), one important issue is understanding the performance of various model selection methods to detect non-invariant models. The objective of this simulation study was to systematically compare the performance of various Bayesian model selection methods: deviance information criterion (DIC), widely available information criterion (WAIC), leave-one-out cross-validation (LOO), and posterior predictive p-value, with other more frequently used methods: likelihood ratio tests, AIC, small-sample corrected AIC (AICC), BIC, and sample-size adjusted BIC (SABIC), for testing measurement invariance in MCFA. Results showed that DIC, WAIC, LOO had the best balance between the Type I error rates and statistical power in MCFA.